Absolutism, Relativism and Anarchy: Alain Locke and William James on Value Pluralism

Neil W. Williams

doi:10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.03

Absolutism, Relativism and Anarchy: Alain Locke and William James on Value Pluralism

Neil W. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the pluralistic theories of James and Locke on the three criteria by which Locke proposes that any pluralistic axiology should be assessed: normativity, objectivity and loyalty. A pluralistic account of value must be able to account for the normativity of particular value systems without appealing to universal standards. It must be able to provide some objective ground for value so that different values can be constructively compared across cultures, without becoming monistic. And it must provide an account which still allows people to find their particular values meaningful and motivating, whilst at the same time encouraging tolerance for differing values. The conclusion of the paper will be that, despite Locke's accusation of anarchism, James's appeal to a limited form of realism means that his theory is better placed to meet these three criteria.

© 2017, Charles S. Peirce Society. The attached document (embargoed until 01/01/2019) is an author produced version of a paper published in THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S. PIERCE SOCIETY uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	400 - 424
Number of pages	24
Journal	The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
Volume	53
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.03
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2017

Access to Document

10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.03

http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/112782/1/Absolutism%2C%20Relativism%20and%20Anarchy%20-%20Alain%20Locke%20and%20William%20James%20on%20Value%20Pluralism.pdf

Cite this

@article{8ee703e521b1406793b1d3164c098580,

title = "Absolutism, Relativism and Anarchy: Alain Locke and William James on Value Pluralism",

abstract = "This paper aims to compare the pluralistic theories of James and Locke on the three criteria by which Locke proposes that any pluralistic axiology should be assessed: normativity, objectivity and loyalty. A pluralistic account of value must be able to account for the normativity of particular value systems without appealing to universal standards. It must be able to provide some objective ground for value so that different values can be constructively compared across cultures, without becoming monistic. And it must provide an account which still allows people to find their particular values meaningful and motivating, whilst at the same time encouraging tolerance for differing values. The conclusion of the paper will be that, despite Locke's accusation of anarchism, James's appeal to a limited form of realism means that his theory is better placed to meet these three criteria.{\textcopyright} 2017, Charles S. Peirce Society. The attached document (embargoed until 01/01/2019) is an author produced version of a paper published in THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S. PIERCE SOCIETY uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.",

author = "Williams, {Neil W.}",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.03",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "400 -- 424",

journal = "The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society",

issn = "0009-1774",

publisher = "Indiana University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolutism, Relativism and Anarchy: Alain Locke and William James on Value Pluralism

AU - Williams, Neil W.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - This paper aims to compare the pluralistic theories of James and Locke on the three criteria by which Locke proposes that any pluralistic axiology should be assessed: normativity, objectivity and loyalty. A pluralistic account of value must be able to account for the normativity of particular value systems without appealing to universal standards. It must be able to provide some objective ground for value so that different values can be constructively compared across cultures, without becoming monistic. And it must provide an account which still allows people to find their particular values meaningful and motivating, whilst at the same time encouraging tolerance for differing values. The conclusion of the paper will be that, despite Locke's accusation of anarchism, James's appeal to a limited form of realism means that his theory is better placed to meet these three criteria.© 2017, Charles S. Peirce Society. The attached document (embargoed until 01/01/2019) is an author produced version of a paper published in THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S. PIERCE SOCIETY uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.

AB - This paper aims to compare the pluralistic theories of James and Locke on the three criteria by which Locke proposes that any pluralistic axiology should be assessed: normativity, objectivity and loyalty. A pluralistic account of value must be able to account for the normativity of particular value systems without appealing to universal standards. It must be able to provide some objective ground for value so that different values can be constructively compared across cultures, without becoming monistic. And it must provide an account which still allows people to find their particular values meaningful and motivating, whilst at the same time encouraging tolerance for differing values. The conclusion of the paper will be that, despite Locke's accusation of anarchism, James's appeal to a limited form of realism means that his theory is better placed to meet these three criteria.© 2017, Charles S. Peirce Society. The attached document (embargoed until 01/01/2019) is an author produced version of a paper published in THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S. PIERCE SOCIETY uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.

U2 - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.03

DO - 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.03

M3 - Article

SN - 0009-1774

VL - 53

SP - 400

EP - 424

JO - The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

JF - The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society

IS - 3

ER -