Anticipating the Nearness of Coronary Heart Infection Utilizing Machine Learning Classifiers

Lamiaa Mohammed Salem  Akoosh; Farheen  Siddiqui; Sherin Zafar; Sameena Naaz; M Afshar  Alam

Anticipating the Nearness of Coronary Heart Infection Utilizing Machine Learning Classifiers

Lamiaa Mohammed Salem Akoosh, Farheen Siddiqui, Sherin Zafar, Sameena Naaz, M Afshar Alam

School of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

Researchers are putting in a lot of time and energy into developing methods to use machine learning algorithms, a subfield of AI, to ‎diagnose disease in an individual patient. Extensive studies have been conducted on the potential benefits of using machine learning ‎techniques in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. For this preliminary study, the study have zeroed down on heart illness to get ‎as specific as possible about our methodology. In this paper, the authors investigate the differences in accuracy between different ‎machine learning approaches specifically, (SVM), (KNN), and a(ANN) when applied to the categorization of cardiovascular ‎illness. Our research makes use of approximately seventy thousand patient records from the Kaggle dataset, which focuses on ‎cardiovascular disease The Kaggle dataset comprises a limited number of variables per patient record, encompassing serum ‎cholesterol, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, relative blood glucose levels, and the presence or absence of angina.‎ The present study examines the Kaggle dataset and employs the (KNN), (SVM), and (ANN) methodologies. The results indicate ‎that the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm, specifically with a value of 9 for the number of neighbors, achieved an accuracy of ‎‎0.997. The SVM model using default hyperparameters achieved an accuracy of 0.9997. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model ‎utilizing a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel and a C value of 100.0 exhibited an accuracy of 0.9998. Conversely, the SVM model ‎employing a linear kernel and a C value of 1000.0 achieved a perfect accuracy of 1.000. The Feedforward neural network achieved a ‎perfect accuracy of 1.000 using the Adam optimization algorithm after 10 epochs and 50 batches.In future research, the authors ‎intend to employ a deep neural network hypermodel in order to enhance the accuracy of their findings.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Engineering (ICMLDE 2023]
Publication status	Published - 24 Jul 2024

Cite this

@inproceedings{d3164d4ea1324f83acfd4d0df0c516c1,

title = "Anticipating the Nearness of Coronary Heart Infection Utilizing Machine Learning Classifiers",

abstract = "Researchers are putting in a lot of time and energy into developing methods to use machine learning algorithms, a subfield of AI, to ‎diagnose disease in an individual patient. Extensive studies have been conducted on the potential benefits of using machine learning ‎techniques in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. For this preliminary study, the study have zeroed down on heart illness to get ‎as specific as possible about our methodology. In this paper, the authors investigate the differences in accuracy between different ‎machine learning approaches specifically, (SVM), (KNN), and a(ANN) when applied to the categorization of cardiovascular ‎illness. Our research makes use of approximately seventy thousand patient records from the Kaggle dataset, which focuses on ‎cardiovascular disease The Kaggle dataset comprises a limited number of variables per patient record, encompassing serum ‎cholesterol, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, relative blood glucose levels, and the presence or absence of angina.‎ The present study examines the Kaggle dataset and employs the (KNN), (SVM), and (ANN) methodologies. The results indicate ‎that the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm, specifically with a value of 9 for the number of neighbors, achieved an accuracy of ‎‎0.997. The SVM model using default hyperparameters achieved an accuracy of 0.9997. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model ‎utilizing a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel and a C value of 100.0 exhibited an accuracy of 0.9998. Conversely, the SVM model ‎employing a linear kernel and a C value of 1000.0 achieved a perfect accuracy of 1.000. The Feedforward neural network achieved a ‎perfect accuracy of 1.000 using the Adam optimization algorithm after 10 epochs and 50 batches.In future research, the authors ‎intend to employ a deep neural network hypermodel in order to enhance the accuracy of their findings.",

author = "Akoosh, {Lamiaa Mohammed Salem} and Farheen Siddiqui and Sherin Zafar and Sameena Naaz and Alam, {M Afshar}",

year = "2024",

month = jul,

day = "24",

language = "English",

booktitle = "International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Engineering (ICMLDE 2023]",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Anticipating the Nearness of Coronary Heart Infection Utilizing Machine Learning Classifiers

AU - Akoosh, Lamiaa Mohammed Salem

AU - Siddiqui, Farheen

AU - Zafar, Sherin

AU - Naaz, Sameena

AU - Alam, M Afshar

PY - 2024/7/24

Y1 - 2024/7/24

N2 - Researchers are putting in a lot of time and energy into developing methods to use machine learning algorithms, a subfield of AI, to ‎diagnose disease in an individual patient. Extensive studies have been conducted on the potential benefits of using machine learning ‎techniques in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. For this preliminary study, the study have zeroed down on heart illness to get ‎as specific as possible about our methodology. In this paper, the authors investigate the differences in accuracy between different ‎machine learning approaches specifically, (SVM), (KNN), and a(ANN) when applied to the categorization of cardiovascular ‎illness. Our research makes use of approximately seventy thousand patient records from the Kaggle dataset, which focuses on ‎cardiovascular disease The Kaggle dataset comprises a limited number of variables per patient record, encompassing serum ‎cholesterol, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, relative blood glucose levels, and the presence or absence of angina.‎ The present study examines the Kaggle dataset and employs the (KNN), (SVM), and (ANN) methodologies. The results indicate ‎that the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm, specifically with a value of 9 for the number of neighbors, achieved an accuracy of ‎‎0.997. The SVM model using default hyperparameters achieved an accuracy of 0.9997. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model ‎utilizing a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel and a C value of 100.0 exhibited an accuracy of 0.9998. Conversely, the SVM model ‎employing a linear kernel and a C value of 1000.0 achieved a perfect accuracy of 1.000. The Feedforward neural network achieved a ‎perfect accuracy of 1.000 using the Adam optimization algorithm after 10 epochs and 50 batches.In future research, the authors ‎intend to employ a deep neural network hypermodel in order to enhance the accuracy of their findings.

AB - Researchers are putting in a lot of time and energy into developing methods to use machine learning algorithms, a subfield of AI, to ‎diagnose disease in an individual patient. Extensive studies have been conducted on the potential benefits of using machine learning ‎techniques in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. For this preliminary study, the study have zeroed down on heart illness to get ‎as specific as possible about our methodology. In this paper, the authors investigate the differences in accuracy between different ‎machine learning approaches specifically, (SVM), (KNN), and a(ANN) when applied to the categorization of cardiovascular ‎illness. Our research makes use of approximately seventy thousand patient records from the Kaggle dataset, which focuses on ‎cardiovascular disease The Kaggle dataset comprises a limited number of variables per patient record, encompassing serum ‎cholesterol, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, relative blood glucose levels, and the presence or absence of angina.‎ The present study examines the Kaggle dataset and employs the (KNN), (SVM), and (ANN) methodologies. The results indicate ‎that the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm, specifically with a value of 9 for the number of neighbors, achieved an accuracy of ‎‎0.997. The SVM model using default hyperparameters achieved an accuracy of 0.9997. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model ‎utilizing a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel and a C value of 100.0 exhibited an accuracy of 0.9998. Conversely, the SVM model ‎employing a linear kernel and a C value of 1000.0 achieved a perfect accuracy of 1.000. The Feedforward neural network achieved a ‎perfect accuracy of 1.000 using the Adam optimization algorithm after 10 epochs and 50 batches.In future research, the authors ‎intend to employ a deep neural network hypermodel in order to enhance the accuracy of their findings.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Engineering (ICMLDE 2023]

ER -