Abstract
In this article, the author reflects on the open access movement as a social and political phenomenon via the lens of Turner’s work on liminality and communitas. Moving beyond the neo‐liberalization frame, which is the primary way that the transformations in open access have been conceptualized to date, she argues that they are better understood as a product of the hybridizing relationship between structure and anti‐structure. This perspective allows us to make sense of the open access movement’s seemingly paradoxical qualities, which, the author suggests, point to cultural processes still very much in the subjunctive mood.
© 2019, RAI. The attached document (embargoed until 02/10/2020) is an author produced version of a paper published in ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
© 2019, RAI. The attached document (embargoed until 02/10/2020) is an author produced version of a paper published in ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 21-23 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Anthropology Today |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2019 |