Effects as a function of Implementation Fidelity of a Transdiagnostic Prevention Program in Young School-Aged Children

Iván Fernández-Martínez, Mireia Orgilés, José P. Espada, Cecilia A. Essau, Alexandra Morales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Super Skills for Life (SSL) is a transdiagnostic prevention program for school-aged children with internalizing problems. The current study aimed to examine the short- and long-term (12-month follow-up) effectiveness of SSL, depending on implementation fidelity. Participants were 123 Spanish-speaking children aged 6-8 years with internalizing symptoms and their parents. High (n = 41) and low fidelity (n = 26) groups were established and compared with a control group (CG) (n = 56). Compared to CG, the high-fidelity group (HFG) achieved better outcomes than the low-fidelity group (LFG) at short and long term, including symptoms of anxiety, depression, and internalizing problems, and also externalizing problems at long-term. The LFG improved key symptoms at short term (depression) and long term (anxiety and depression). Findings suggest that SSL is beneficial even if not delivered at maximum fidelity, although considering the influence of implementation fidelity is critical because the high-fidelity implementation yielded the greatest effects when compared to the CG. This research provides valuable data, analyzing for the first time the influence of fidelity on SSL outcomes in young school-aged children exhibiting internalizing symptoms, while there is still a lack of studies of these characteristics concerning transdiagnostic prevention programs targeting childhood anxiety and depression.

© 2021, Published by Elsevier Ltd. The attached document (embargoed until 16/09/2023) is an author produced version of a paper published in EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102011
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume89
Early online date16 Sept 2021
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2021

Cite this