Extended validation of the Relational Depth Frequency Scale: Retest reliability, divergent validity, criterion validity with psychotherapy satisfaction, and measurement invariance in UK‐ and US‐stratified samples

Gina Di Malta, Zhuang She, Brett Raymond‐Barker, Mick Cooper

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    AbstractBackgroundThe Relational Depth Frequency Scale (RDFS) assesses moments of profound connection in psychotherapy, associated with therapeutic benefit. To date, the RDFS has not been tested for its retest reliability, divergent and criterion validity, and measurement invariance, nor has it been tested in stratified samples of psychotherapy patients.MethodsTwo stratified online samples of United Kingdom (n = 514) and United States (n = 402) psychotherapy patients filled out the RDFS, the Brief Social Desirability Scale (BSDS); and the Satisfaction with Therapy and Therapist Scale‐revised (STTS‐R). Two subsamples of patients (United Kingdom: n = 50 and United States: n = 203) filled out the RDFS again after 1 month.ResultsReliability for the six‐item RDFS were excellent in United Kingdom and United States samples (Cronbach's α = 0.91 and 0.92; retest r = 0.73 and r = 0.76). Divergent (r = 0.10 and r = 0.12) and criterion validity (r = 0.69; and r = 0.70) were good. Full scalar invariance was established across countries, genders, and time.ConclusionThis contributes important evidence to the validity of the RDFS. Future research should assess predictive validity against psychotherapy outcomes and replicate these analyses in diverse samples.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2040-2052
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Clinical Psychology
    Volume79
    Issue number9
    Early online date20 Apr 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2023

    Keywords

    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Clinical Psychology

    Cite this