Abstract
We advance the debate on board effectiveness in corporate governance by suggesting how the behavioural dynamics view may address a core issue of large, hazardous industries. A pertinent example today is Britain’s nuclear industry, whose toxic legacy of redundant plant and nuclear waste cannot be ignored. We argue that the behavioural view offers an important dimension of public engagement in addressing this legacy, although engagement should take place within a governance structure that enables private citizens to relate systematically with board executives who manage nuclear sites. This argument is developed in the context of the governance of these sites, where little attempt has been made to dispose of their legacy after sixty years of nuclear operations. We investigate this puzzle in public documents surrounding Britain’s worst nuclear accident and find that its core issues continue to resonate with the agency-based governance of the country’s nuclear sites. Principally, poor managerial control and accountability have constrained public engagement with site managers and questioned their trustworthiness. In addressing this ‘deficit of trust’, we suggest how dynamic stakeholder relationships may be built within a system of ‘trustworthy governance’ that forms a missing driver for an effective behavioural view of corporate governance in hazardous industries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |
| Publication status | Submitted - 26 Apr 2018 |
Keywords
- corporate governance, management, public sector, behaviour, agency theory
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver