Love, satisfaction and exhaustion in the nursery: Methodological issues in evaluating the impact of Work Discussion groups in nursery

Peter Elfer, Sue Greenfield, Sue Robson, Dilys Wilson, Antonia Zachariou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

126 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The significance of practitioners’ emotions in nursery interactions is evident in vivid accounts from widely different socio-cultural contexts. Work Discussion (WD) is a model of professional reflection distinctive in its attention to emotion in work interactions. Psychoanalytic conceptions, particularly the notion of the defended subject, underpin WD. Enabling participants in WD to discuss subjective work experience in an open way is thus subtle and sensitive. Research has not addressed how the impact of different models of professional reflection may be evaluated. Can WD, with its explicit attention to the emotions evoked at work, strengthen practitioners’ engagement with children and families? This paper critically discusses the complex methodological issues in evaluating the impact of WD on nursery practitioners, children and parents in nursery. The challenge is to combine the intense subjectivity of WD with an evaluation that is rigorous and objective. Later papers will illustrate data analysis and report findings. © 2018, Taylor & Francis. The attached document (embargoed until 16/09/2019) is an author produced version of a paper published in Early Child Development and Care uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalEARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2018

Cite this