Neural Circuitry of Novelty Salience Processing in Psychosis Risk: Association with Clinical Outcome

Gemma Modinos, Paul Allen, Andre Zugman, Danai Dima, Matilda Azis, Carly Samson, Ilaria Bonoldi, Matthijs G. Bossong, Matthew Broome, Mathilde Antoniades, Jesus Perez, Oliver Howes, James Stone, Anthony A. Grace, Philip McGuire, Beverley Quinn, George W Gifford, Sophie E Smart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)


Psychosis has been proposed to develop from dysfunction in a hippocampal-striatal- midbrain circuit, leading to aberrant salience processing. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during novelty salience processing to investigate this model in people at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis according to their subsequent clinical outcomes. Seventy-six CHR participants as defined using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) and 31 healthy controls (HC) were studied while performing a novelty salience fMRI task that engaged an a priori hippocampal-striatal-midbrain circuit of interest. The CHR sample was then followed clinically for a mean of 59.7 months (~5 years), when clinical outcomes were assessed in terms of transition (CHR-T) or non-transition (CHR-NT) to psychosis (CAARMS criteria): during this period, 13 individuals (17%) developed a psychotic disorder (CHR-T) and 63 did not. Functional activation and effective connectivity within a hippocampal-striatal-midbrain circuit were compared between groups. In CHR individuals compared to HC, hippocampal response to novel stimuli was significantly attenuated (P=0.041 family-wise error corrected). Dynamic Causal Modelling revealed that stimulus novelty modulated effective connectivity from the hippocampus to the striatum, and from the midbrain to the hippocampus, significantly more in CHR participants than in HC. Conversely, stimulus novelty modulated connectivity from the midbrain to the striatum significantly less in CHR participants than in HC, and less in CHR participants who subsequently developed psychosis than in CHR individuals who did not become psychotic. Our findings are consistent with preclinical evidence implicating hippocampal-striatal- midbrain circuit dysfunction in altered salience processing and the onset of psychosis.

© 2019, Oxford University Press. The attached document (embargoed until 18/09/2020) is an author produced version of a paper published in SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)670-679
Issue number3
Early online date18 Sept 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2020

Cite this