Nuclear stories in the news media: Filtering and altering of expert views

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Proponents consider nuclear energy as a long-term, safe and low-cost form of clean energy production. Opponents claim that nuclear power is anything but safe and low-cost, and point out that the evaluation of its environmental impact should be based on full life cycle analysis. By adapting the Social Amplification of Risk (SARF) conceptual framework, the chapter focuses on the role of news media in formulating nuclear-related risk perceptions. The study analyses the press releases of the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, in 2023 and the news media articles on nuclear energy of four leading, global media outlets from the same year, to understand the role of news media as social amplification stations in the process. The study confirms that each news media plays a dynamic role in the risk communication process through filtering and altering the original messages. The paper confirms that the level of filtering and altering is impacted by the credibility of the original disseminator of the message, however, this credibility is not considered universal. Nuclear energy risk messages tend to have strong international contexts, cannot focus on technical aspects only and often carry political and military implications.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCommunicating Science, Climate Change and the Environment in Hybrid Media
Subtitle of host publicationConstructed Facts, Contested Truths
EditorsMette Marie Roslyng, Anna Rantasila, Anna Maria Jönsson
PublisherRoutledge: Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter11
ISBN (Print)ISBN 9781032766652
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 27 Feb 2025

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies on Media, Communication and Politics

Keywords

  • risk awareness
  • social amplification of risk
  • nuclear energy perception
  • media representation

Cite this