‘Predatory’ open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of ‘legitimate’ academic publishing

Kirsten Bell

‘Predatory’ open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of ‘legitimate’ academic publishing

Kirsten Bell

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

167 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The concept of the 'predatory' publisher has today become a standard way of characterising a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilise the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a 'legitimate' journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the 'centre' and exclude that from the 'periphery'.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	651
Number of pages	662
Journal	tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Volume	15
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 8 Jul 2017

Keywords

open access publishers
predatory journals
academic publishing
parody
mimicry

Access to Document

‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as ParodyFinal published version, 972 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870/1031Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{be5cac5412f7415da795532cc5d245f2,

title = "{\textquoteleft}Predatory{\textquoteright} open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of {\textquoteleft}legitimate{\textquoteright} academic publishing",

abstract = "The concept of the 'predatory' publisher has today become a standard way of characterising a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilise the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a 'legitimate' journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the 'centre' and exclude that from the 'periphery'.",

keywords = "open access publishers, predatory journals, academic publishing, parody, mimicry",

author = "Kirsten Bell",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "8",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "651",

journal = "tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Predatory’ open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of ‘legitimate’ academic publishing

AU - Bell, Kirsten

PY - 2017/7/8

Y1 - 2017/7/8

N2 - The concept of the 'predatory' publisher has today become a standard way of characterising a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilise the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a 'legitimate' journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the 'centre' and exclude that from the 'periphery'.

AB - The concept of the 'predatory' publisher has today become a standard way of characterising a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilise the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a 'legitimate' journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the 'centre' and exclude that from the 'periphery'.

KW - open access publishers

KW - predatory journals

KW - academic publishing

KW - parody

KW - mimicry

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 651

JO - tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique

JF - tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique

IS - 2

ER -