Response to Gert Biesta's Review of Childhood and the Philosophy of Education:: An Anti-Aristotelian Perspective

Response to Gert Biesta's Review of Childhood and the Philosophy of Education: An Anti-Aristotelian Perspective

Andrew Stables

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	587-589
Journal	Studies in Philosophy and Education
Volume	29
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9207-6
Publication status	Published - 2010

@article{e6ae4ff140a043f7aba4034c3e55fc7d,

title = "Response to Gert Biesta's Review of Childhood and the Philosophy of Education:: An Anti-Aristotelian Perspective",

author = "Andrew Stables",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1007/s11217-010-9207-6",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "587--589",

journal = "Studies in Philosophy and Education",

issn = "0039-3746",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Gert Biesta's Review of Childhood and the Philosophy of Education:

T2 - An Anti-Aristotelian Perspective

AU - Stables, Andrew

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

U2 - 10.1007/s11217-010-9207-6

DO - 10.1007/s11217-010-9207-6

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0039-3746

VL - 29

SP - 587

EP - 589

JO - Studies in Philosophy and Education

JF - Studies in Philosophy and Education

IS - 6

ER -