Abstract
The purpose was to compare 14[degrees]C (CWI14[degrees]C) and 5[degrees]C (CWI5[degrees]C) cold water immersion following intermittent running. On three occasions, nine male team-sport players undertook 12 min of CWI14[degrees]C, CWI5[degrees]C or non-immersed seated recovery (CON) following 45 min of intermittent running exercise. Maximal cycling performance and markers of recovery were measured before and in the 0 - 72 h after exercise. Peak power output (PPO) was immediately reduced following all interventions (d = 1.8). CWI5[degrees]C was more effective at restoring PPO than CWI14[degrees]C (d = 0.38) and CON (d = 0.28) 24 h post-exercise while both CON (d = 0.20) and CWI5 (d = 0.37) were more effective than CWI14[degrees]C after 48 h. CWI was more effective than CON at restoring PPO 72 h post-exercise (d = 0.28 - 0.30). Mean power output (MPO) was higher in CON compared to CWI5[degrees]C (d = 0.30) and CWI14[degrees]C (d = 0.21) but there was no difference between CWI5[degrees]C and CWI14[degrees]C (d = 0.08). CWI5[degrees]C was more effective than CWI14[degrees]C for restoring MPO to baseline levels 24 h (d = 0.28) and 72 h (d = 0.28) post-exercise; however, CON was more, or equally, effective as CWI5[degrees]C and CWI14[degrees]C throughout. Lactate and creatine kinase concentrations were unaffected. Perceived muscle soreness remained elevated in CWI5 and CON throughout but was similar to baseline in CWI14[degrees]C after 72 h. In conclusion, repeated bouts of exercise are initially impaired following 5[degrees]C and 14[degrees]C CWI, but PPO may be improved 72 h post-exercise. CWI is not recommended for acute recovery based on these data. Athletes and coaches should use the time currently allocated to CWI for more effective, alternative recovery modalities.
© 2017, National Strength and Conditioning Association. The attached document (embargoed until 16/11/2018) is an author produced version of a paper published in The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
© 2017, National Strength and Conditioning Association. The attached document (embargoed until 16/11/2018) is an author produced version of a paper published in The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH |
Early online date | 16 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 Nov 2017 |