The Ghost in the Machine: IAPT and organisational melancholia

Rosemary Rizq

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The introduction, funding and roll-out of the NHS’s Improving Access to
Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme represents one of the biggest changes to mental health service provision ever seen in the UK. Drawing on Hinshelwood’s (1994) notion that public mental health services may be regarded as a defence against overwhelming anxieties relating to psychological fragility and emotional distress, I explore the tendency for IAPT services to systematically disavow feelings of loss and vulnerability in both staff and patients. I propose three mechanisms by which this disavowal occurs: the promotion of a consumerist ethos and a ‘patient choice’ agenda; the deployment of
discourses minimizing notions of fragility and dependence; and the proliferation of bureaucratic and surveillance systems aimed at continually monitoring and evaluating staff and clinical activity. Drawing on Freud’s (1917) distinction between mourning and melancholia, I go on to argue that a sense of unconscious loss may come to be constitutive of the culture within IAPT services where the institutionally-sanctioned repudiation of containment cannot be spoken about, addressed or mourned. Through a short case example, I illustrate the way in which organizational melancholia may be hidden within the structures of an IAPT service and enacted by both staff and patients.

© The author. British Journal of Psychotherapy © 2012 BAP and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. This is an author produced version of a paper published in the British Journal of Psychotherapy, uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self- archiving policy. The final published version (version of record) is available online at the link below. Some minor differences between this version and the final published version may remain. We suggest you refer to the final published version should you wish to cite from it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-335
JournalBritish Journal of Psychotherapy
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this