Video counselling and psychotherapy: A critical commentary on the evidence base

Kate Smith; Naomi Moller; Mick Cooper; Lynne Gabriel; Jeannette Roddy; Robert Sheehy

doi:10.1002/capr.12436

Video counselling and psychotherapy: A critical commentary on the evidence base

Kate Smith, Naomi Moller, Mick Cooper, Lynne Gabriel, Jeannette Roddy, Robert Sheehy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Pre-pandemic research has suggested that video counselling is as effective as face-to-face practice. However, the mass migration of therapy to the online video domain as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it essential to interrogate the evidence base. This paper provides a critical commentary on how video therapy is defined/labelled, the current evidence about whether video therapy is effective, and whether the working alliance and therapeutic relationship functions differently in video counselling. The paper concludes that while the evidence to date is promising, it is limited in quantity and applicability and hence generalisability. Lack of evidence is not evidence that video therapy is ineffective, but the large gaps in understanding highlight the importance, both ethically and empirically, of further research in this area.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	92-97
Number of pages	6
Journal	Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
Volume	22
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12436
Publication status	Published - 25 Jun 2021

Keywords

Psychiatry and Mental health
Applied Psychology
Clinical Psychology

Access to Document

10.1002/capr.12436Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12436Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{1c1b4dfa0b8041f6b08f925491de0fcd,

title = "Video counselling and psychotherapy: A critical commentary on the evidence base",

abstract = "Pre-pandemic research has suggested that video counselling is as effective as face-to-face practice. However, the mass migration of therapy to the online video domain as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it essential to interrogate the evidence base. This paper provides a critical commentary on how video therapy is defined/labelled, the current evidence about whether video therapy is effective, and whether the working alliance and therapeutic relationship functions differently in video counselling. The paper concludes that while the evidence to date is promising, it is limited in quantity and applicability and hence generalisability. Lack of evidence is not evidence that video therapy is ineffective, but the large gaps in understanding highlight the importance, both ethically and empirically, of further research in this area.",

keywords = "Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology",

author = "Kate Smith and Naomi Moller and Mick Cooper and Lynne Gabriel and Jeannette Roddy and Robert Sheehy",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1002/capr.12436",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "92--97",

journal = "Counselling and Psychotherapy Research",

issn = "1473-3145",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video counselling and psychotherapy: A critical commentary on the evidence base

AU - Smith, Kate

AU - Moller, Naomi

AU - Cooper, Mick

AU - Gabriel, Lynne

AU - Roddy, Jeannette

AU - Sheehy, Robert

PY - 2021/6/25

Y1 - 2021/6/25

N2 - Pre-pandemic research has suggested that video counselling is as effective as face-to-face practice. However, the mass migration of therapy to the online video domain as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it essential to interrogate the evidence base. This paper provides a critical commentary on how video therapy is defined/labelled, the current evidence about whether video therapy is effective, and whether the working alliance and therapeutic relationship functions differently in video counselling. The paper concludes that while the evidence to date is promising, it is limited in quantity and applicability and hence generalisability. Lack of evidence is not evidence that video therapy is ineffective, but the large gaps in understanding highlight the importance, both ethically and empirically, of further research in this area.

AB - Pre-pandemic research has suggested that video counselling is as effective as face-to-face practice. However, the mass migration of therapy to the online video domain as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it essential to interrogate the evidence base. This paper provides a critical commentary on how video therapy is defined/labelled, the current evidence about whether video therapy is effective, and whether the working alliance and therapeutic relationship functions differently in video counselling. The paper concludes that while the evidence to date is promising, it is limited in quantity and applicability and hence generalisability. Lack of evidence is not evidence that video therapy is ineffective, but the large gaps in understanding highlight the importance, both ethically and empirically, of further research in this area.

KW - Psychiatry and Mental health

KW - Applied Psychology

KW - Clinical Psychology

U2 - 10.1002/capr.12436

DO - 10.1002/capr.12436

M3 - Article

SN - 1473-3145

VL - 22

SP - 92

EP - 97

JO - Counselling and Psychotherapy Research

JF - Counselling and Psychotherapy Research

IS - 1

ER -