What comes first? The chicken-egg relationship between integrated thinking and reporting

Irma Malafronte; John Pereira

What comes first? The chicken-egg relationship between integrated thinking and reporting

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between integrated thinking (IT) and integrated reporting (IR). It contributes to the chicken-egg debate between IT and IR by answering the question ‘what comes first?’ and examines the determinants of IT and IR for a sample of European listed companies. The findings from both the empirical analysis and interviews with IR preparers show that IT leads to IR, and vice versa, thus creating a virtuous circle where the decision to publish an integrated report favours an inclusive decision-making process, as well as embracing the IT journey favours the adoption of IR. These results could drive companies’ internal choices and policymakers’ initiatives aimed at progressing an integrated organisational culture by identifying the differential drivers of IR and IT and suggest that companies’ journey towards integration can start either from the integrated report (IR develops IT) or from developing an IT culture that creates a fertile background for IR (IT leads to IR).

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Management and Governance
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 30 Jan 2025

Embargoed Document

Manuscript accepted MAGO What comes first - IR IT
Accepted author manuscript, 518 KB
Embargo ends: 3/02/99

Cite this

@article{5f89745d7a824d468abe0763fbe62700,

title = "What comes first? The chicken-egg relationship between integrated thinking and reporting",

abstract = "This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between integrated thinking (IT) and integrated reporting (IR). It contributes to the chicken-egg debate between IT and IR by answering the question {\textquoteleft}what comes first?{\textquoteright} and examines the determinants of IT and IR for a sample of European listed companies. The findings from both the empirical analysis and interviews with IR preparers show that IT leads to IR, and vice versa, thus creating a virtuous circle where the decision to publish an integrated report favours an inclusive decision-making process, as well as embracing the IT journey favours the adoption of IR. These results could drive companies{\textquoteright} internal choices and policymakers{\textquoteright} initiatives aimed at progressing an integrated organisational culture by identifying the differential drivers of IR and IT and suggest that companies{\textquoteright} journey towards integration can start either from the integrated report (IR develops IT) or from developing an IT culture that creates a fertile background for IR (IT leads to IR).",

author = "Irma Malafronte and John Pereira",

year = "2025",

month = jan,

day = "30",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Management and Governance",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What comes first? The chicken-egg relationship between integrated thinking and reporting

AU - Malafronte, Irma

AU - Pereira, John

PY - 2025/1/30

Y1 - 2025/1/30

N2 - This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between integrated thinking (IT) and integrated reporting (IR). It contributes to the chicken-egg debate between IT and IR by answering the question ‘what comes first?’ and examines the determinants of IT and IR for a sample of European listed companies. The findings from both the empirical analysis and interviews with IR preparers show that IT leads to IR, and vice versa, thus creating a virtuous circle where the decision to publish an integrated report favours an inclusive decision-making process, as well as embracing the IT journey favours the adoption of IR. These results could drive companies’ internal choices and policymakers’ initiatives aimed at progressing an integrated organisational culture by identifying the differential drivers of IR and IT and suggest that companies’ journey towards integration can start either from the integrated report (IR develops IT) or from developing an IT culture that creates a fertile background for IR (IT leads to IR).

AB - This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between integrated thinking (IT) and integrated reporting (IR). It contributes to the chicken-egg debate between IT and IR by answering the question ‘what comes first?’ and examines the determinants of IT and IR for a sample of European listed companies. The findings from both the empirical analysis and interviews with IR preparers show that IT leads to IR, and vice versa, thus creating a virtuous circle where the decision to publish an integrated report favours an inclusive decision-making process, as well as embracing the IT journey favours the adoption of IR. These results could drive companies’ internal choices and policymakers’ initiatives aimed at progressing an integrated organisational culture by identifying the differential drivers of IR and IT and suggest that companies’ journey towards integration can start either from the integrated report (IR develops IT) or from developing an IT culture that creates a fertile background for IR (IT leads to IR).

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Management and Governance

JF - Journal of Management and Governance

ER -